Friday, 3 June 2016

Facebook officially addressed the conspiracy theory about listening to your phone calls

By on 23:57:00


Facebook has shut down rumors that it uses your mobile device's microphone to eavesdrop on conversations so it can better target ads. In a statement issued on June 2nd, Facebook said it "does not use your phone’s microphone to inform ads or to change what you see in News Feed." The company says it only shows ads based on people's interests and other profile information.


Facebook is responding directly to claims made by Kelli Burns, a professor of mass communications at University of South Florida. Burns told The Independent this week that she thought the company was secretly listening to its users' conversations, but had no concrete proof.

PEOPLE HAVE CLAIMED FACEBOOK EAVESDROPS ON ITS USERS FOR YEARS

Burns wasn't the first to float the theory, although her claims did provoke a new torrent of bombastic headlines. In fact, fears of Facebook eavesdropping has been bubbling around social media circles for quite some time. The logic is that Facebook has access to your microphone because users give it permission to listen when trying to use mobile app features like capturing video. It's not so farfetched then to think Facebook might be listening all the time — to what you talk about in person or on the phone with others — so it can plant stories in your News Feed and display ads related to what you were discussing. Devices like Amazon’s Echo definitively do listen all the time, unless muted.

THIS WOULD BE AN EGREGIOUS VIOLATION OF PRIVACY

Of course, this would be an egregious violation of privacy (and probably illegal). Facebook has since been forced to clarify that it listens to what you say only when you activate a microphone-specific feature. "We only access your microphone if you have given our app permission and if you are actively using a specific feature that requires audio," the recent statement reads. "This might include recording a video or using an optional feature we introduced two years ago to include music or other audio in your status updates." The feature Facebook is referring to is designed to tag a music or television show in the background when you're writing a status. It requires you to opt-in and was marketed as similar to music-tagging service Shazam.

If you're paranoid, however, and really don't want Facebook listening to anything you say at any time, regardless of its supposed utility to advertisers, you can turn off the app's access to your microphone. In iOS, go to the Settings panel, find Facebook, and slide off the "microphone" option. On Android, go to "Privacy and Safety" in Settings, find the microphone section under the app permissions panel, and toggle off Facebook's access.

Old Friends Senior Dog Sanctuary Is the Last Pure Place Online

By on 22:09:00
http://pixel.nymag.com/imgs/daily/selectall/2016/06/03/

Two decades into the bonkers experiment known as the World Wide Web, regular users have come to accept the fact that the internet is nasty. Even the most well-intentioned conversations on social media can (and usually do) take a hairpin turn into insults, trolling, and harassment. One of the primary rules for a halfway-decent web-surfing experience is to “never read the comments.” It’s generally assumed that you can’t have a large presence online without attracting the worst of the web.

But it doesn’t have to be this way. There are spaces on the web which have, against all odds, constructed large, pure, and kind communities. It might sound impossible, but there is a community out there, with a staggering 1.4 million members, that is entirely free of invective and vitriol. A light in the darkness. A rapturous joy. I am talking about the Old Friends Senior Dog Sanctuary, the only pure spot on the web.

Four years ago, a half hour from Nashville in Mount Juliet, Tennessee, Zina Goodin and her husband, Michael, established the Old Friends Senior Dog Sanctuary as a way to take care of aging dogs. “Once we bring a dog into our program they’re with us for life,” Zina says. “and we make sure they stay in loving homes and among family members until they pass away. We also keep about 60 dogs with us here at the sanctuary,” a sprawling five acres.

Along with the sanctuary’s establishment, Zina set up a Facebook page, which is perfect in every single way. I have seen nothing like it in all of my time on social media. A community of more than a million people, who just compliment, and share pictures of, dogs. Every single photo posted to the page gets hundreds of comments and thousands of likes. It is only positive vibes about flawless creatures, like Leo here.
https://fbcdn-photos-c-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-xfa1/v/t1.0-0/p526x296/
Leo has a big furry coat in the winter, but is very sensitive and doesn't like to be brushed or have his coat fooled with in any way. When he does go for his yearly summer cut, he has to be sedated for his comfort and the groomer's safety. He gets a lion cut in mid-spring that grows back into full fur by mid-fall. This is how he looks in March.
http://pixel.nymag.com/imgs/daily/selectall/2016/06/03/

“I thought that I could tell good stories about senior dogs and the dogs that went through our program, to show people that senior dogs weren’t just old dogs waiting to die.” Zina recalled. “They were able to have a good life, have fun, be family members and really benefit the family they lived with.” Zina does almost all of the Facebook posting, and for the most part, her strategy has remained consistent over the last four years.

Commenters “have their favorite dogs here that get posted. We have some real rock stars that people follow. And we create kind of a soap opera, we tell the stories of each of the dogs so people can follow their lives without actually being here.”

And let me be clear, people love these dogs. Every picture is a gift, as are the comments below them, in which people talk to the dogs as if they know them intimately.
https://fbcdn-photos-d-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-xpl1/v/t1.0-0/p526x296/
Gertrude is doing her morning yoga stretches. Here she is practicing her downward dog
http://pixel.nymag.com/imgs/daily/selectall/2016/06/03/
https://fbcdn-photos-d-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-xfp1/v/t1.0-0/p370x247/


http://pixel.nymag.com/imgs/daily/selectall/2016/06/03/
 Every single comment thread is like this. It is wonderful.

“I hit my first 50 likes and I was freaking out,” Zina recalled. “I thought that was the greatest thing ever. We kinda poked along for the first year. I think we hit 500 that fall, and then by the end we might’ve been to a couple thousand likes.” Then, in 2014, Old Friends started seeing its largest jumps, and for the past year or so, the page’s following has been going up around one percent every week, which is a significant, consistent gain given its audience size.

Facebook allows users to pay in order to “boost” posts, increasing the likelihood that they’ll appear in a user’s news feed. Zina says that Old Friends has only ever boosted posts meant to sell merchandise in order to raise funds — the facility is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit. The interactions on the usual dog photos, however, are all organic.

Part of the reason people keep coming back to Old Friends is that — there’s no other way to put this — an honest-to-god internet fandom has developed around the dogs. After a BuzzFeed post celebrating Old Friends this past January, even Tumblr took up the reins in its own oddball way.

https://67.media.tumblr.com/8e3fba90e120aec6fa09c80271d05fa9/
https://66.media.tumblr.com/66befdb98784b9ad38c42af2f7b23bbd/
https://66.media.tumblr.com/0743ef225258ef27f739eab01ede2aa5/
https://67.media.tumblr.com/f34d97f5e4d5c9abe1400983403ca06c/
https://67.media.tumblr.com/a7a3539cb5821b8f818dd3d22bb172d3/
Zina rattles off a few of the leading canines:

Leo’s our rock star. Everybody knows Leo, I think. Mildred, she’s a pug who’s running for president. She was a one-eyed pug, now she’s a no-eyed pug, but that doesn’t really bother her. Gertrude has her following. Leila has some folks that follow her. … Captain Ron’s very popular. Spumoni.
That Old Friends has managed to scale and maintain what can only be described as purity is a testament to Zina’s social-media skill and perseverance, the power of dogs, and the innate kindness of people. Amidst private messages about senior dog rescue and animal care, or information about the facility, the inbox also fills with messages like, “I love Leo, please give him a hug for me.”

Keeping the Old Friends page positive is, according to Zina, pretty easy work. She doesn’t have to moderate comments heavily, partially because she tries to keep it light. Occasionally, dogs will pass on and obituaries will be posted, but the snapshots of daily life rarely focus on the maladies plaguing these elderly pets.

There is, however, one event that consistently brings out the angry and the grouchy. “There’s never anything negative except when Leo gets a haircut,” Zina says. “They think we should never shave Leo. (Leo disagrees.)”

That’s the beauty of the Old Friends Senior Dogs sanctuary, where the worst thing that could happen is that somebody gets a haircut.
https://66.media.tumblr.com/e1e40615df2d333cf2872a7db3d80549/

Watch Donald Trump's Crazy CNN Interview With Jake Tapper About The 'Mexican Judge'

By on 21:59:00
http://bullseye-prod.aggrego.org/wp-ag/wp-content/uploads/sites/72/2016/06/
​Donald Trump has repeatedly insisted that federal judge Gonzalo P. Curiel is unfit to preside over a lawsuit against Trump University because of "Mexican heritage"1 — an allegation that Trump insists is not racist, somehow. CNN's Jake Tapper pressed Trump on that question, with Trump insisting both that Latinos will vote for him en masse in the coming election and that Curiel will rule against him due to the judge's Latino heritage. It's certainly something:

Everything Stores Do to Trick You into Buying More Stuff

By on 21:54:00
https://vice-images.vice.com/images/content-images-crops/2016/06/02/
High street shops like H&M play loud music to make us feel good and buy more. Photo via Wikimedia


It's a time of economic crunch, and we're all poor and jobless, so stores have to resort to witchcraft and trickery to fool us into giving them our money. High BPM music to make you eat faster in McDonald's, branded scents to make you feel that kick of synthesized nostalgia every time you hit up a Starbucks, low lights, dark lights: There are dozens of environmental cues shops use to make you shop faster, spend more, and come back to do it all over again.

"Sensory marketing is one of the things that has been used a lot in the past few years," Dr. Mario Campana, lecturer in marketing and consumer behavior at Goldsmiths, told VICE. "The visual and the music has an impact on the way we shop. Research shows if you have upbeat music in a shop, there's a greater chance the consumer will buy more. You tend to move faster. With visual merchandising, research shows if you have cleaner lines and shelves and not too much visual complexity to the environment—not loads of piles in the corner and it's more neat—there is more tendency for the consumer to buy." You don't even know it, but peacocks are inside your head, and they are fucking it up.

But it's getting a bit much. Following this frankly incredible piece of investigative reporting by the Daily Mail, there's now a petition to get shops and restaurants to cool it with the background music, with the group "Pipedown" teaming up with charity Action on Hearing Loss to collectively ask everyone to turn that ruddy R&B music down, sir, I'm trying to eat here!

Muzak aside, there's something to this whole "shops using mysterious ancient incantations to make us buy $30 T-shirts," so we spoke to Dr. Gorkan Ahmetoglu, a lecturer in business psychology at University College London, to find out how it all works.


Starbucks pumps out a strong coffee smell to draw us in. Photo via Wikimedia

VICE: People are mad about shops playing music too loudly. Do they do that to stress us out and make us buy stuff quickly? 
Dr. Gorkan Ahmetoglu: There are several studies showing that if shops play music, people will spend more. Not every type of music works, though—generally, if the volume is lower, if it's a familiar tune playing in the background, people will get more pleasure out of shopping, and when people are in a good mood, they spend more. Sometimes, if people don't like the type of music or if it's too loud, it will have a negative effect, or no effect at all.

I heard that McDonald's plays fast music, so you eat quickly and leave?
Yeah, exactly. Music with a higher tempo makes people feel more aroused. Some research suggests that higher tempo music makes people move faster—and even spend more.

How about smells? I've been to a lot of places where a shop will have a specific smell. Is that something they're trying to cultivate?
It's the same as with music—nice smells make people feel better, and therefore they spend more. An important thing with smell—and indeed with music—is that it's congruent with what kind of product is being sold and what the product is like. So if you're selling chocolates, the smell should be chocolate, not flowers.

Subway has such a distinctive smell—do shops make their own smells to pump out?
Yeah, take Starbucks: Coffee is a strong smell. You can smell a Starbucks on the street from meters away. It's very unlikely that the coffee they're producing is actually that strong, so I think there could be evidence to suggest they're using additional smells. Rolls Royce put leather scent in their cars in order to get people to feel at home with their new cars, and that has a positive impact on sales.

If I go into Starbucks, I'll smell it, and I'll know exactly what I'm about to get. Is it also a way of cultivating brand loyalty?
I wouldn't say it's brand loyalty, necessarily. You associate the smell with a nice taste. So, in essence, the smell triggers positive emotions, and positive emotions are related to shopping more. There's a pure evolutionary explanation for that: We use our smell to understand the quality of products, and therefore, retailers can use smells to trigger those positive emotions.

What else do shops do to make us buy more?
A classic thing is putting sale signs everywhere to make it complicated for the consumer, so they start using automatic judgments rather than rational decisions, which is impossible when there's so much information. Using hedonic products like fruits and chocolates when you're just entering a shop makes people feel positive and up for shopping more. Also, putting impulse purchase items throughout the stores and at checkouts keeps people shopping, and also gets them excited when they think they've finished shopping. Color and lighting are important, too.

Like in Abercrombie & Fitch shops—where it's dark, and there are people above you dancing on podiums?
Yeah, exactly. From a psychological standpoint, they are probably trying to get you to think that the brand is all about sexual appeal, so if you make the shop like a club or a bar—where there is above average sexual tension in the air—you are probably more inclined to look at clothes that would be in line with that, and just be more aroused, let's say, and more open to suggestion.

Do you think consumers are aware of this?
Most consumers won't be aware of these influences or environment cues. Even when they are aware and are skeptical, they will still be influenced by them. The human brain—when it comes to practical stuff like shopping—tends to go by intuition rather than rational thinking. So the point of all this stuff is to try and guide our intuition in particular directions.

Even when we know all that stuff is by the checkout, so we buy it compulsively, we still do it.
Yeah, you can't control it. You just can't control your instincts—it would be too much effort. If you tried to not be influenced by marketing tactics, I think you probably wouldn't be able to live a normal life.


Generation revolution: how Egypt’s military state betrayed its youth

By on 21:47:00
Ruqayah crouched behind a sandbag wall, blinking away the sweat running into her eyes. The sun was directly overhead and the acrid smell of burning plastic stung the back of her throat. Shouts and screams rose thinly over gunfire, helicopter rotors and the rumble of armoured bulldozers.

It was the middle of August 2013, soon after the Eid feast that marks the end of Ramadan, and the security forces were clearing the huge protest camps at Rabaa and al-Nahda squares in central Cairo. Their tens of thousands of inhabitants were demonstrating against the removal of the president, Mohamed Morsi, in a military coup at the beginning of July. Beside Ruqayah huddled another teenage girl and a young man, pressed as close as they could get to the rough hessian of the sandbags. To the side, sprawled on the concrete with blood pooling around them, lay the bodies of two men who had been shot dead by police snipers.

“Don’t move until I tell you. Then, run,” the man told the two girls. Ruqayah nodded silently and waited, closing her eyes, clasping the other girl’s hand, for the brief silence that meant the shooters were reloading. She knew to bend double and run in zigzags to make herself a harder target. When she opened her eyes she saw other people – adults, teenagers and small children – crouching in the angle of walls, against cars, behind rough barricades of paving stones, anything that would protect them from the gunfire coming from the square and the snipers on the rooftops around them. Then one man, bearded and strongly built, stood up and spread his arms wide in defiance, facing the square.

“I won’t crawl,” he shouted. “Allahu Akbar!” Ruqayah squeezed her eyes shut again, but she heard his skull shatter as the sniper’s bullet struck.

“Now!” the young man told them and they dashed behind him, weaving left and right, for the shelter of a side street. Ruqayah was just 15, wiry and fleet, but the other girl was older and heavier. A bullet caught her in the leg and she fell as Ruqayah watched in horror. The girl crawled the last metres to them, leaving a trail of blood.

Six weeks earlier, on 30 June, hundreds of thousands of people had marched in Egypt’s major cities, demanding the resignation of their president. The Muslim Brotherhood’s candidate, Mohamed Morsi, had been elected only a year earlier, in a run-off with a pro-army candidate, with 52% of the vote. At first, the anti-Morsi marches seemed like an echo of the popular demonstrations that had unseated the dictator Hosni Mubarak after three decades in power. The protesters even chanted the slogans of the 2011 revolution – “Leave, leave!”, “The people demand the fall of the regime!”. A movement named Tamarod (Arabic for “rebellion”), which had organised the protests, claimed to have gathered 22 million signatures for its petition demanding that Morsi resign and that a fresh presidential election be held. But while Tamarod appeared to be a grassroots organisation – its volunteers lining Cairo’s roads to collect signatures from drivers – behind the scenes, it was backed by powerful old‑regime figures in business and the military who wanted the president and the Muslim Brotherhood gone.

Egypt had been a military state since 1952, and the Brotherhood had been locked in a struggle with its rulers for almost as long. Until 2011, the organisation was banned and its members – along with anyone else suspected of sympathising with political Islam – were subject to surveillance, imprisonment, torture and even execution. The regime, led in succession by the military men Gamal Abdel Nasser, Anwar Sadat and Hosni Mubarak, had reason to fear Islamists. Though the Brotherhood had renounced violence in the 1970s, in 1981 members of a jihadi group had assassinated President Sadat during a military parade barely 500m from where the Rabaa camp now stood.
Egypt's vice president Hosni Mubarak with president Anwar Sadat, 6 October 1981.

 Egypt’s then vice president Hosni Mubarak with Anwar Sadat at the military parade where Sadat would shortly be assassinated, October 1981. Photograph: AFP/Getty Images
Mubarak’s overthrow offered the Brotherhood a reprieve, and, newly legalised, it dominated the parliamentary elections of early 2012. In June that year, Morsi became Egypt’s first elected and first civilian president.

Now, the country was divided. On 30 June, as the Brotherhood’s enemies protested against Morsi and portrayed the group as fanatics intent on creating an Iranian-style Islamic state, supporters had organised their own, smaller marches in support of the president. In Cairo, these pro-Morsi demonstrations had settled at two protest camps: one at Rabaa, in the east, and one at al-Nahda Square in the west.

Ruqayah had been living in the Rabaa camp since 30 June. In 2011, she reasoned, the world had hailed the huge anti-Mubarak protests that filled Tahrir Square as an inspiring expression of freedom and democracy. After the revolution, the power should lie in the hands of the people. Why not in Rabaa too?

Some of Ruqayah’s family and friends were members of the Brotherhood, others sympathised with the organisation, and all had suffered directly or indirectly from the years of persecution. In spite of her youth, Ruqayah’s parents preferred to see their daughter stand up for justice than bow to the hated regime. The protesters at Rabaa were her people, and she felt it was her duty to help them.

With other high-school and university students, Ruqayah volunteered at the checkpoints at the camp’s perimeter, checking handbags and IDs as women entered, patting them down for hidden weapons or explosives. Her post was at the camp’s western edge.

After four chaotic days of street protests, the army finally executed what Egypt’s struggling factions had hoped or feared they would – a military coup. Ruqayah turned 15 on 3 July, the day that the army arrested Morsi and took him into custody. She was a quiet, studious girl who attended an Islamic high school, where she was trying to take her end-of-year exams while protesting. That morning, she finished her last algebra exam and went straight to work on her checkpoint. By late evening she was exhausted, but she stayed awake with the other volunteer guards to listen to the scheduled military statement on an old radio. Ruqayah wasn’t worried. Morsi was their rightful president. God would never let him be overthrown like the tyrant Mubarak.

Around Ruqayah, young men began crying to God for help. At midnight, they heard shooting in the darkness
But when she heard the chief of the armed forces General Abdel Fattah el-Sisi telling the nation that he had suspended the constitution, nominated an interim president and would schedule new elections in due course, she knew that what had happened was a coup. Around her, young men began crying to God for help. They had always seemed so strong, towering over Ruqayah and calling her “little sister”. Suddenly they looked weak and humiliated. At midnight, they heard shooting in the darkness as security forces surrounded the camp, sealing it off from the rest of Cairo. It was the first time Ruqayah had ever heard live gunfire. She dropped to her knees in fear, reciting Qur’anic verses and praying for God to protect them.

In concert with the coup, Islamist TV channels that supported the president were closed down. In the days that followed, the pro-army media broadcast endless hours of patriotic messages and vilification of Morsi and the Brotherhood. The majority of Egyptians, exhausted by 18 months of upheaval, seemed grateful for the return of the familiar certainties of military rule.

But there were many dissenters, too: among them, supporters of the Muslim Brotherhood, other Islamists, leftists and liberals. Not all of these groups supported Morsi – some were simply opposed to military rule or wanted to defend the democratic process. The camps at Rabaa and al-Nahda, organised and led by the Brotherhood, were their strongholds.

By early August, Rabaa was home to an estimated 85,000 protesters from across the country, housed in a hastily constructed tent city a kilometre across. They dreamed of reinstating their elected president and sending the army back to its desert barracks – and they were prepared to risk everything, with God’s help, to make that happen.

In the middle of the sit-in, I went to visit Rabaa. It was the fasting month of Ramadan and as mercilessly hot as a desert city in high summer could be. The army had blocked all the roads leading to the camp so I walked the last kilometre from the highway, skirting the tanks and weaving through the barricades the protesters had built from paving stones and bricks, until I reached the checkpoint where Ruqayah was stationed.

I had expected the mood in the camp to be sombre, but when I arrived, it was as festive as Tahrir at the height of the 2011 revolution. As I waited in the women’s line for entry, young men patrolled with backpack tank-and-hose kits, misting us with water to keep cool. The women and girls around me, all veiled and clad in heavy robes, were laughing and competing to be sprayed in the face.

Inside, the familiar intersection where I had often sat in snarled traffic was transformed. At ground level, the scale of the camp was breathtaking. Tents were neatly ranged along the centre of the street, tall square constructions of timber and blue plastic sheeting that were occupied by families lying on mats reading the Qur’an or sleeping until sunset, when they could eat and drink. On the pavements, street vendors grilled spits of chicken and sold water pistols, fruit and sunglasses. Banners proclaimed “Morsi is our legal president”, “My vote counts” and “Democracy v coup”. In front of the mosque that gave the square and the camp its name, the main stage, where a succession of speakers usually railed against the injustice of the coup, was playing Qur’anic recitation. The army’s supporters said that the camp’s residents had tortured and murdered people in the spaces under the stage, and that they kept caches of weapons and explosives there. When I climbed underneath its edge, all I could see was a dim, empty expanse of scaffolding.
The pro-Morsi protest camp at Rabaa square in Cairo, 25 July 2013

 The pro-Morsi protest camp at Rabaa al-Adawiya square in Cairo before the clearance. Photograph: Mohammed Saber/EPA
I sat in a homely tent with a group of women, all engineering lecturers and PhD students. They had wired electricity in from a nearby street light, set up fans and a small gas burner and hung up a neatly lettered banner reading “Engineers Against the Coup”.

“We’ll never leave,” said a dignified middle-aged woman who taught at a university in the Nile delta. “It’s a matter of our rights, dignity and democracy. Why should the army seize the country again, by force?”

“We’re ready to be martyred here,” said a younger woman. “We’d rather die free than live under this injustice. We know God will give us our rights, even if the army won’t.” The others nodded in agreement. Once you passed the checkpoints on the camp’s edge, God, not the army, was held as the supreme arbiter of earthly politics.

To the majority, Rabaa seemed trapped in time, a fragment of an unworkable past. But to Ruqayah, it was a utopia
I could never get used to hearing people talk about martyrdom. But after their long history of struggle with the state, it was a central part of the Brotherhood’s self-image. The army’s supporters said that the protesters at Rabaa and al-Nahda were actively seeking death, keeping women and children in the camps as human shields – though no one appeared to question why peaceful protesters should need “human shields” against their own security forces.

But as the weeks rolled on, it was increasingly obvious to all but the most fervent believers that Morsi was never coming back. Since the coup, the army had held him incommunicado at a secret location and the rest of the country had almost forgotten him. To the majority, Rabaa seemed trapped in time, a fragment of an unworkable past. But to Ruqayah, it was a utopia. When she looked around she saw that everything in the camp was purposeful and harmonious, from the communal kitchens to the schedule for public speakers, the construction of tents and the security details that she belonged to. She thought, as others had thought about Tahrir in 2011, that Rabaa was a miniature model of Egypt’s perfect future. To Ruqayah, Rabaa was far more beautiful than Tahrir, because it was guided by the true spirit of Islam. She knew its victory was guaranteed.

To the less idealistic, it was clear that Rabaa had a darker side. The progressive young Islamists, who managed media relations and the rota of speakers, despaired at the unreconstructed sheikhs who insisted on preaching sectarian hatred against Christians and other supposed traitors to Morsi, rather than speaking about democracy and human rights. They shared a joke on Facebook: “Please God, let these sheikhs have the honour of being martyred first.”

Though they claimed that their legitimacy stemmed from the mass protests against Morsi on 30 June, Egypt’s new military leaders had no time for public expressions of anything that threatened their own interests. The camps, they decided, would not be tolerated. Rabaa had already been encircled by the security forces, which now began to take tougher action.

On 8 July, 51 protesters were shot dead and more than 400 injured at a sit-in near the square. On 26 July, General Sisi, who had become the face of the military takeover, asked for another mass public demonstration to give him a mandate to “fight terrorism”, and tens of thousands of people took to the streets in sedate marches guarded by the police and army. Street protest, the tool young people had turned to in desperation to take back power from Mubarak’s regime, had now been co-opted by the state.

“The source of legitimacy is the people,” Sisi had reflected piously in a speech at a military graduation ceremony two days earlier. “The ballot box is a means for legitimacy. If there was any other way than taking to the streets to reject [Morsi’s] legitimacy, the people would have taken it.”

He did not extend the same logic to his opponents. The day after the pro-Sisi march, around 90 unarmed pro-Morsi protesters were shot dead by security forces on a main street close to Rabaa. Before the Eid feast on 8 August, the army-appointed prime minister announced that Rabaa and its smaller twin camp at al-Nahda Square would be cleared by force.

In the early hours of 14 August, Ruqayah curled up on a blanket at her post. She had been on duty at the checkpoint without a break for two days. Before dawn, her mobile rang. “The army are breaking into the square,” her uncle shouted. “You have to get out.” Ruqayah laughed. “They say this every day, Uncle. Don’t worry about it.”

But then she heard gunfire in the distance and smelt teargas in the air. Racing back towards the square, Ruqayah saw oncoming armoured bulldozers, with blunt-nosed armoured personnel carriers behind them. She found her mother and little sister sheltering in the field hospital, a small hall close to the mosque with rudimentary facilities for treating sunstroke and flu. Reassured that they were safe, she ran back to her post at the boundary. Behind the paving-stone barricades, her fellow guards were throwing stones at a line of armoured personal carriers advancing through a choking cloud of teargas.

Then she heard the whipcrack of bullets in the air around her. As far as Ruqayah knew, everyone in the camp was unarmed, though it later emerged that 10 or 20 protesters had firearms. Minutes after the clearance began, soldiers on the ground and snipers on surrounding rooftops were using live ammunition indiscriminately against the entire camp.
The burnt-out mosque at Rabaa al-Adawiya, Cairo, 15 August 2013

 The burnt-out mosque at Rabaa, the day after the clearance of the protest camp. Photograph: Ahmed Hayman/EPA
According to the security forces’ plan, the entrance where Ruqayah was stationed was supposed to be a “safe exit” for protesters. As they approached, the army vehicles blared recorded assurances that exits would be provided. Brotherhood speakers yelled from the main stage that their promises were lies. “Don’t leave!” they urged the protesters. But now it was too late. With the gunfire, gas and careering vehicles there was little chance of escape.

“Girls take cover,” the men at her post were shouting. Ruqayah refused to move. Then her friend Amro fell. For six weeks, they had worked together every day on the checkpoint. She ran forward, shouting, and the men around him parted, thinking in the confusion that a woman on the front lines must be a doctor. As she knelt beside Amro, helplessly watching the blood pumping from bullet wounds in his chest and head, she saw his eyes go blank. It was the first time she had seen someone die. It was 7am, less than an hour after the attack on the camp had begun.

By the middle of the day, Ruqayah had lost count of the number of people she had seen die. Bulldozers had pulverised their barricades, crushing people beneath them. In the late afternoon, the security forces reached the centre of the square. Special forces stormed the last of the protesters’ footholds: an empty tower block, a hospital close by, and finally the mosque and its courtyard. The mosque and hospital should have been safe. But now they were filled with the bodies of the protesters who had been shot, crushed or burned – at first a few, then hundreds, arranged in rows on the floor, their ankles, wrists and jaws bound hastily with strips of torn sheet.

At 5.30pm, there was a lull in the shooting and loudspeakers announced there was a safe exit for protesters to the west. Ruqayah met her mother, dragging her little sister by the hand, at the edge of the square. “They’re evacuating the square, they’re evacuating us, we have to leave!” her mother shouted, her face streaked with tears. When Ruqayah refused to go, her mother slapped her hard across the face. They ran out together, ducking between the soldiers. As they left, the field hospital, the main stage, the mosque and the main hospital were set on fire. Many of the bodies they held were burned.

By the end of August, Cairo was a changed city. The army had renewed the state of emergency – which Egypt had lived under almost continuously since 1967 – and imposed a strict dusk-till-dawn curfew. The Cairo I knew didn’t sleep, its streets traffic-choked and alive with workers, shoppers and families until the small hours. Now, when I landed at the airport after curfew, the streets were still and silent as my taxi carried me through the army checkpoints, where soldiers with guns and sniffer dogs loomed out of the dark to check my ID and search my bags.

Tanks and personnel carriers sat at Cairo's major intersections, their guns trained down the main streets
Coils of razor wire blocked the end of the road where I lived, and the owners of the sleazy shisha cafe on the corner, where men from the Gulf sat with heavily made-up women until dawn, had planted an Egyptian flag in the plant pot that weighed one end of the wire down. Tanks and personnel carriers sat at the intersections, their guns trained down the main streets, their crews drinking glasses of tea brought out by my neighbours. In a middle-class area, few wanted to antagonise the army.

There was no longer any of the sense of self-reliance and empowerment that had sprung up after the revolution of 2011. Then, the police had withdrawn from the streets and in each neighbourhood men had banded together to defend their own streets and houses against opportunistic crime – and to discuss politics. By autumn 2013, the country’s new rulers had banned any local organising similar to that of 2011, instructed everyone to observe the curfew and brought neighbourhoods back under police control.

The Brotherhood was officially banned, as it had been from 1954 until 2011, and its assets seized by the state. For a long time, no one was sure how many people had been killed at Rabaa and al-Nahda. “The official number of bodies that came out of Rabaa was 40-something,” the interior minister Mohamed Ibrahim told the pro-army CBC TV channel on 31 August. “The Brotherhood brought bodies from the governorates to Iman mosque to say these were people who had died in Rabaa.” The Brotherhood claimed that up to 6,000 had died. Eventually, independent human rights groups estimated that 1,000 people had been killed in central Cairo in 12 hours.

Rabaa trailed revenge in its wake. Because Copts were assumed to support the regime, Islamist gangs burned 37 churches and attacked dozens of Christian-owned schools, businesses and homes, leaving at least four dead. There were also attacks against the state. A lynch mob murdered 14 police officers in a village outside Cairo. “We will show you rage and we will make you see terrorism,” they spray-painted on the village church after burning it along with the police station. In north Sinai, militants ambushed and shot dead 25 off-duty policemen. A powerful bomb planted in central Cairo narrowly failed to assassinate the interior minister Mohamed Ibrahim, who had overseen the clearance of the camps. It was the city’s first major bombing for years, and it shook Cairenes who had prided themselves on the capital being more secure than troubled Baghdad or Damascus.

A Sinai-based jihadi group calling itself Ansar Beit el-Maqdis, Champions of Jerusalem, claimed responsibility for the attack. There was no evidence that the militants were connected to the Brotherhood. But in the sticky gloom of the curfew, with everyone confined to their homes all evening, the country was gripped by the hysteria of a witch hunt. When I turned on the TV, presenters were describing Rabaa protesters and jihadis alike as “terrorists”, “enemy agents” or simply “Brotherhood”.
Protesters in Cairo call on Abdel Fattah el Sisi to run for president, March 2014.

 Protesters in Cairo call on the military leader Abdel Fatah al-Sisi to run for president, March 2014. Photograph: Anadolu Agency/Getty Images
It was no surprise that the corrupt and conservative media was so easily controlled by the army, but I was stunned by how quickly ordinary people who so recently had seemed to support the Islamists and their vision for Egypt’s future could turn against them. “Brotherhood” had become a catch-all term synonymous with everything to be hated and feared by its opposite, “honourable citizens”. At the same time, Brotherhood supporters were exaggerating their plight online, claiming that military planes had bombed survivors, calling for bloody revenge against the regime and those – particularly Christians – who supported it.

The number of formally affiliated Muslim Brothers in Egypt was relatively small – estimates ranged from 300,000 to one million – but suspicion stretched far beyond the organisation’s official members. Making the “Rabaa sign” – a hand with four fingers held aloft, as “Rabaa” means “fourth” in Arabic – was now sufficient grounds for arrest and detention, as was sharing the sign on social media. Even using the phrase “military coup” could encourage a neighbour or colleague to report you to the police hotlines advertised on nightly news programmes – honourable citizens referred to “the 30 June revolution”.

On the annual 6 October public holiday, Tahrir Square, symbol of the uprising against Mubarak, was firmly in army hands. Tanks blocked the streets around the square and officers manned a single checkpoint entrance. Inside, vendors sold balloons, candyfloss and posters of Sisi with Nasser, Sisi with a roaring lion, Sisi with his trademark sunglasses. The military leader, invariably pictured in uniform, had become an instant icon – an action hero for men, a pin-up for middle-aged women.

“Egypt wants to say thank you to the army!” shouted an MC.

“Thank you, thank you to the army!” the crowd roared.

One man was carrying a portrait of Sisi and repeatedly kissing the general’s picture on his resolute military mouth. “I love Sisi, he saved us from the Brotherhood, from the terrorists!” he said.

But, like the endless TV programmes celebrating the military, the festivity was undermined by violence and spite. Another man danced past, thrusting a poster into my hands. When I unrolled it, I found an image of a grinning Sisi preparing to slaughter a sheep with Morsi’s head crudely Photoshopped on to it.

As the winter of 2013 wore on, the curfew was lifted but anti-Brotherhood hysteria escalated. In December, state security questioned Vodafone officials over a TV advert starring a puppet called Abla Fahita, which was thought to be sending coded messages about bombings to the Brotherhood. The same week, three journalists working for the Qatari satellite news channel al-Jazeera, two with western passports, were seized from the Marriott hotel in Cairo, and footage of their arrest was broadcast on a pro-army TV channel to a soundtrack of menacing music from the Hollywood film Thor. Qatar, where several senior members of the Brotherhood had sought refuge, was suspected of attempting to destabilise the Egyptian state.

At the beginning of 2014, the country prepared for a referendum. Ostensibly it was a vote on the new constitution drafted after Morsi’s removal, but it was widely seen as a vote on Sisi’s expected presidential candidacy. The irony of validating a military coup through the ballot box was not lost on Sisi’s opponents, who organised small street protests, though protesting was now illegal and police were ready to detain anyone whose conservative dress or demeanour even hinted that they might be an Islamist.

On the first day of voting, Ruqayah and her younger sister, along with her sister’s friend, were arrested on the street when they tried to stop police seizing two veiled young girls. At the district police station the girls were thrown into a windowless room. There were six boys already in there, sitting in a row on the floor, blindfolded with their own clothes. Ruqayah learned that they all attended Islamic schools. Ruqayah, at 15, was the oldest of them all. An officer came in to have a look at them. “Your parents haven’t done a good job, so now we’re going to bring you up properly,” he told them. “We’ll make sure you’re well behaved before you leave.” Two of the boys were taken next door and beaten for laughing together.

At nightfall, the policemen took Ruqayah, her sister and friend down to the communal cell under the police station where adult women detained on criminal charges – drug dealing, prostitution, violent crimes – were held. Below ground, there was a heavy smell of unwashed bodies. At the gate of the cell was one of the women prisoners, tasked with searching new admissions. The girls were roughly searched and stripped.

The cell they were put in was unbearably hot and airless. Thirty women were packed together in the tiny room, and most of them were smoking. The women stared at the girls, taking in their neat clothes and frightened faces. “Your dirty friends who died at Rabaa went straight to hell,” one said.

In the middle of the night, a policeman took Ruqayah upstairs for interrogation. He questioned her about her support of the Brotherhood, and read her a list of charges, which included attempting to take pictures of a military building, obstructing the referendum process and being a member of the Muslim Brotherhood.

“We’re not members,” protested Ruqayah. “We just hate injustice.”

After two days, the girls were released without charge. They knew they were the lucky ones – they had heard stories about torture and rape in the police stations and prisons. The uprising against Mubarak had been sparked by the brutality of the police, who were poorly trained and largely unaccountable. Three years later, little had changed.

 Abdel Fatah al-Sisi shakes hands with Saudi Arabia's King Salman, Egypt, April 2016.
 Abdel Fatah al-Sisi greets Saudi Arabia’s King Salman on a visit to Egypt, April 2016. Photograph: Sherif Abdel Minoem/AP
A few days later, Ruqayah heard the referendum results on the radio – a 98% “yes” vote for Sisi’s constitution. It was like the Mubarak-era referendums that her parents had told her about, when the president would return triumphantly to office with more than 90% of the vote each time. Soon afterwards, Sisi announced he was resigning from the army in order to run for the presidency. Billboards and placards sprang up around Egypt, showing him not in his familiar uniform but in a tracksuit, polo shirt or smart suit, with a discreet prayer bruise – a mark cultivated by some devout men by pressing their foreheads hard to the ground during prayer – calculated to set housewives’ hearts aflutter.

The fall of Mubarak had brought Egyptians – liberals, Islamists, young and old – together, at least temporarily. The return of the army had set them against each other. The threat of terrorism and Islamic extremism, which the army promised to fight but had done so much to cultivate, once again justified all its excesses of repression.

Sisi became president in May 2014 with 96.9% of the vote, but his leadership brought a succession of disasters
While turning citizens against each other, the regime also attempted to project an image of unity and optimism. When I passed through it in the months after the clearance, Rabaa looked like any other of Cairo’s traffic intersections. The mosque had been hastily rebuilt and whitewashed. A billboard announced the ongoing “beautification and development of Rabaa” and a new sculpture of two crooked arms holding a marble ball rose amid the traffic. The military engineers who erected it had explained that the large arm was the army, the smaller arm was the police, and between them they held the Egyptian people.

It was soon clear how empty the army’s promise of a new dawn had been. Sure enough, Sisi became president in May 2014 with 96.9% of the vote, but his leadership brought a succession of disasters. The collapsing economy was propped up only by loans from wealthy Gulf countries. In a desperate attempt to keep the money coming, Sisi gave two strategically located Red Sea islands to Saudi Arabia. Despite his regime having arrested 12,000 people on political charges – formulated as “membership of a terrorist group” – in 2015 alone, genuine terrorism was on the rise. The extremist group Ansar Beit el-Maqdis pledged allegiance to Islamic State, took a new name – Sinai Province – and blew a Russian airliner out of the sky.

The government, meanwhile, spent billions on a redundant extension to the Suez Canal and incinerated a group of Mexican tourists in a botched airstrike in the western desert. It was also forced to deny involvement in the murder of an Italian student whose body was found in Cairo bearing the hallmarks of security service torture. (The US, which sees Sisi as a supposed bulwark against jihadi groups, continues to supply Egypt with an annual $1.3bn of military aid.)

The last time I saw Ruqayah was in the summer of 2014, in a chain cafe in Cairo’s largest shopping mall. As the state’s persecution of its opponents became ever more systematic, it was safer to meet in such crowded, anonymous places. She repeated her account of the devastation and bloodshed she had witnessed in a soft voice, surrounded by tables of laughing teenagers and families laden with shopping bags.

Afterwards, as I watched her walking away into the milling crowds, I thought that her experiences gave the lie to the veneer of normality around us. Ruqayah was typical of the generation of young Egyptians who had led the protests of 2011 to 2013. They had seen their efforts topple one dictator, witnessed the first true elections in Egypt’s history and tasted, however briefly, freedom and self-respect. As they grew older, they would not accept the same bargain with the state – repression in exchange for apparent security and stability – that their parents and grandparents had. In trying to crush them, the army had created a timebomb. However stable the country seemed, it would not be so in the future.

This is an adapted extract from Generation Revolution: On the Front Line Between Tradition and Change in the Middle East, which is published by Harvill Secker

Guideline for fuel consumption, CO2 emission and electric power consumption

By on 21:21:00
Car manufactures and importers would like to assist you in comparing fuel consumption and CO2 emission of different types of passenger cars and makes.


DAT Group was assigned by the two German national Associations VDA- Verband der Automobilindustrie e. V. (German Association of Automotive Industry) and VDIK- Verband der internationalen Kraftfahtzeughersteller e. V. (Association of international Vehicle Manufacturers) to create and publish a guideline for fuel consumption and CO2 emission and electric power consumption according to the German act of EnVKV.

The Guideline contains fuel consumption and emisson data of passenger cars currently available in the German market. In addition you will find basic information e.g. engine and transmission specifications which will supply you with the foundation to compare different types of passenger cars.
https://fbcdn-photos-d-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-xpf1/v/t1.0-0/s480x480/

https://scontent-mxp1-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/


Performance to make the legacy of its predecessors proud. The BMW M3 "30 Years M3" comes with an increase in engine output to 331 kW/450 hp and offers sprints from 0 to 100 km/h in just 4 seconds.
___________
Fuel consumption and CO2 emissions for the BMW M3 “30 Years M3”: Fuel consumption in l/100 km (combined): 8.8 - 8.3CO2 emissions in g/km (combined): 204 - 194Further information about the official fuel consumption and the official specific CO2 emissions for new passenger automobiles can be found in the 'New Passenger Vehicle Fuel Consumption and CO2 Emission Guidelines', which are available free of charge at all sales outlets and from DAT Deutsche Automobil Treuhand GmbH, Hellmuth-Hirth-Str. 1, 73760 Ostfildern, Germany and on

The Man in the Woods

By on 10:16:00
When a mind begins to unravel, who has the right — and the responsibility — to step in?


t’s cold in the woods. Dark, too. This redwood thicket outside Fort Bragg, California, feels like a passageway to some other realm. Redwoods have that effect. They’re Grimms’ fairytale trees: They render you small and disoriented, a child who’s wandered off. Look up: Their branches brawl for space with Douglas firs and grand firs, and the canopy of green nearly blots out the sun. Look ahead: You can’t see farther than a few yards.
There aren’t many well-groomed trails here, just skid roads etched by logging equipment. Ferns and branches web across them, as hard to untangle as knotted hair. They hide gopher snakes, turkey vultures, coyotes, gray foxes, mountain lions, black bears. What kind of man would squat here — not in the homeless camps near the forest’s edge, but deep in the wilderness?
One summer morning, Jere Melo tromped into the thicket. A beloved city councilman in Fort Bragg, a coastal town three hours north of San Francisco, Melo had spent much of his 69 years in these woods: first as a forester and now as a property manager for a timber company. Clad in an orange vest and aluminum hard hat, he checked that gates were open and roads closed, or vice versa. If he stumbled on a marijuana garden (this was Mendocino County, in the heart of California pot land), he slashed water pipes, hauled out beer cans, and gave the sheriff’s office a heads-up. The growers didn’t rattle him much. Most reacted like teenagers at a kegger and fled.
On this trek, Melo was accompanied by Ian Chaney. A tiling contractor who lived on nearby Sherwood Road, Chaney was the one who’d told Melo about the man in the woods, Aaron. Chaney didn’t know his surname, but he’d repeatedly run into Aaron near timber-company land and recognized his shaved head, broad shoulders, and tattered black wardrobe. A few weeks back, Chaney noticed a firelike glow in the forest. A chainsaw whirred. Soon Chaney spotted Aaron lugging a grower’s kit of potting soil and fertilizer into the woods. “An eccentric person,” Chaney warned Melo. “A bit unstable.”
It was midmorning when the men huffed up an incline, wind in their faces. They peeled back some brush and discovered a waterline. Chaney assumed they would write down GPS coordinates for the sheriff, then hike back. Instead, Melo followed the line, hacking it with his ax, and Chaney reluctantly tagged along. They soon arrived at a bunker: a fortress of dirt and logs a few feet deep, with a fire pit inside and barbed wire on top. Nearby were neat rows of red poppies. Opium poppies. Gave Chaney the creeps.
Melo put down his ax and picked up his camera. That’s when Chaney saw a bullet casing. “We got to go,” he whispered. Something crackled. Leaves, probably. The men turned around.
There he was, a few yards upslope: shaved head, broad shoulders, clad in black.
“Hey!” Melo called. “What the fuck are you doing over there?”
FBI!” the man yelled. Then, gunfire.
Melo spun and fell. Chaney plastered himself against the bunker, whipped out his pistol, and popped off a few rounds. Aaron kept firing as Chaney slid-ran down the hill, fumbling with his cellphone.
“911, what is your emergency?”
“OK, listen to me right now. I’m being shot at —”
“Where are you at?”
“I’m out in the woods, and I think Jere Melo has been hit. I got —” Gunfire interrupted. “Shit!”
“Where are you at?”
“Goddamn it!” Some beeps. Chaney was thumbing the phone. “I’m out in the fucking woods!”

The town of Fort Bragg, California
THERE ISN’T MUCH to Fort Bragg, population 7,200, a longtime logging town whose last mill shut down in 2002. You can zip through in less than ten minutes, stoplights included: welcome sign, RV park, weathered vacation lodges (Harbor Lite, Seabird, Ebb Tide), Safeway, Rite Aid, charming downtown peddling mango-pepper jelly and candy cap mushroom ice cream. But the real attraction unfurls on both sides of the city: untamed California.
To the west is the Mendocino coast, a stretch of wide beaches and lush headlands as sinuous as the edge of a puzzle piece and a Hollywood stand-in for rugged Maine in Murder, She Wrote. Fort Bragg’s swath is known for its glass beaches, former city dumps where waves polish broken tail lights and beer bottles into “sea glass” that resemble Jolly Ranchers. To the east, the redwoods don’t just soar above the town, they swallow it entirely. The forest is so immense, so impenetrable, that the quickest way to some parts is the Skunk Train, a logging route turned tourist railway that chugs 40 miles inland.

He riffed on a Neil Young lyric: “It’s better to burn out than fade away.” Perhaps it was a hint as to where Aaron’s mind was: That spring, Kurt Cobain used it as the sign-off to his suicide note.
The redwoods have long beckoned loners and miscreants, seekers of fortune and refuge: flower children and tree sitters and cults (not far from here, Jim Jones was a teacher before moving his Peoples Temple to San Francisco and then to Guyana). Growing up in Fort Bragg, Aaron Bassler found solace here, too — he was a woodsman, not a lost boy.
Aaron was born in 1976 to a young couple, Jim Bassler and Laura Jo­hansen. Their rocky union, at times more a brawl than a marriage, lasted only four years before they divvied up their possessions — Laura got the TV and washing machine, Jim the table saw and yellow couch — and tried to start anew. Both stayed in Fort Bragg and eventually remarried, and Jim had another son; Aaron and his younger sister, Natalie, sometimes felt they were floating between the two families, never entirely part of either one.


Senior picture of Aaron Bassler
Aaron quickly sprouted from towheaded Gerber child to sullen teen who studied too little and drank too much. In his senior picture, in 1994, he’s dashing in a tuxedo and bow tie: thick dark hair, sapphire eyes, lips taut in an almost-smile. He was a lean 6-foot-1, and for a time, he played baseball and skied. But as far as his friends knew, he never had a girlfriend. Something about him warned: Stay away.
In the forest, though, he sprang to life. He and his buddy Jeremy James poached salmon, hunted quail, hiked the tracks, camped. They tended pot gardens and prided themselves on dodging security. One whiff of laundry detergent, an interloper’s scent, and they escaped to forts they’d made along the Noyo River, their sleeping bags wrapped in trash bags and tucked under brush.
The boys loved movies and quoted them constantly; their escapades must have felt like scenes in Stand by Me. They dreamed of joining the Army. Under “Future Plans” in his yearbook, Aaron wrote, “Get into the Special Forces.” For a quote, he riffed on a Neil Young lyric: “It’s better to burn out than fade away.” Perhaps it was a hint as to where Aaron’s mind was: That spring, Kurt Cobain used it as the sign-off to his suicide note.


Jason Caudillo with a map of Fort Bragg
THE SEARCH FOR Aaron began immediately. Following Chaney’s directions, the local SWAT team started to retrace Melo’s path. They had chased plenty of cases into the woods, but usually farther inland, where the climate was warmer and more conducive to pot growing. This terrain was less navigable. “Jurassic Park,” joked one.


A search team discovered Hershey’s Kisses wrappers. ILLUSTRATIONS BY HOLLY WALES
By nightfall, the team hadn’t even located the bunker — brush-choked trails had slowed them; at one point, a few guys tumbled into a ravine. They camped in the pitch-black forest, huddled around a glow stick, caked in dried sweat, shivering. After sunrise, they crunched their way through the brush and found Melo’s body. Nearby were 7.62 x 39 mm casings (from Aaron), 9 mm casings (from Chaney), a sleeping bag, foil twisted into a marijuana pipe, and silver Hershey’s Kisses wrappers — but no sign of where Aaron had fled.
The SWAT guys wanted to stake out specific locations, but with only a few dozen deputies to police the entire county, the department didn’t have the manpower. Instead, they rode the Skunk Train into the forest, each clad in camouflage and humping at least 30 pounds: a helmet, night-­vision gear, a vest with rifle plates, water, ammunition, and a rifle whose size and power rivaled that of Aaron’s Norinco SKS Sporter. (Later, redwood gawkers sometimes joined them on the train. The operator, a man known as Chief Skunk, joked that the trip had probably never been safer.) They hiked around the woods, trying to flush out Aaron much as they would a pheasant, with few hints as to his exact location. Aaron didn’t carry a cellphone or anything they could track. Aircraft streaked across the sky but couldn’t see through the awning of branches.

They hiked around the woods, trying to flush out Aaron much as they would a pheasant, with few hints as to his exact location.
One of the team’s leaders, deputy Jason Caudillo, had served in the Army, the same branch Aaron once dreamed of joining, and he felt strange deploying Ranger School tactics here. The men hiked single file, or “ducks in a row.” When they spoke, they whispered. They’d likely hear Aaron, or wildlife spooked by Aaron, before they spotted him. They found snuffed-out fires. They found pigeon carcasses. They found more than one crosshair. At least, that’s what they called them: circles with a cross in the middle — a taunt or a warning or nothing at all. This guy’s well-armed, Caudillo thought. He’s in shape. He’s obsessed with military tactics. He could be behind this redwood tree or that stump. He could be up that slope, around that bend. Someone’s going to die.
AARON BACKED OUT of enlisting in the Army at the last minute. His friend Jeremy blamed the easy money of weed. But other problems soon cropped up. Aaron was guzzling peppermint schnapps and tinkering with acid and psychedelic mushrooms; when he wasn’t plastered, he was avoiding eye contact and mumbling about Nostradamus and quantum physics. His father was alarmed. But mustachioed, flannel-shirted, plainspoken Jim was a fisherman, not a shrink. Aaron’s an addict, he told himself.

Jim Bassler at his home
Jim tried to protect his son. He moved Aaron into an old farmhouse across the street, on an overgrown patch of family land. Their neighborhood, near the northeast edge of Fort Bragg, has a rustic feel: goats chomping yards, a sign hawking PIGS RABBITS EGGS, the ocean salting afternoon breezes. One day, Aaron lit a fire in the farmhouse’s wood-burning stove, and the flames raced off and eviscerated the roof. It’s sunny today, Jim thought afterward. Warm, too. Why build a fire?
Aaron was closer to his mom, Laura, though their conversations were mostly pragmatic, with Aaron asking her to cook dinner or wash clothes. Aaron tried a few square jobs: delivering newspapers, cleaning a theater, chopping firewood, fishing with Jim (though that was always ill-fated; Aaron got seasick). But he preferred his marijuana gardens — in the woods, he was alone. Though he was constantly running from timber-company guards, he was able to earn enough to buy a black leather couch, a big-screen TV, a guitar, and some guns, as well as stash a few hundred dollars in a can (and then bury it) and brag to Jeremy, “I’m rich!”

The farmhouse that burned down
IN THE DAYS following Melo’s murder, Aaron’s mug shot glowered from downtown windows under the words ARMED AND DANGEROUS. It was an eerie counterpart to that long-ago yearbook photo: Now his face was hard, the light in his eyes dim. To the town, he was the bogeyman.


Mug shot of Aaron
The sheriff charged with finding him, Tom Allman, had been a cop for three decades. Silver-haired and genial, Allman was probably best known for his tolerance of small mom-and-pop grows and his efforts to wipe out huge ones. Earlier that summer, he’d led a multiagency charge — including hundreds of officers and a squadron of helicopters and planes — that, authorities said, uprooted more than 600,000 marijuana plants. But he’d never overseen such a sprawling hunt for a fugitive; to his knowledge, no one in county history had.
The operation was run out of the Fort Bragg substation, a squat blue building whose walls were papered with maps reminding him how daunting his task was: 400 square miles of skid roads and game trails that Aaron had hiked for much of his life, many unmarked and so clotted with vegetation that you practically had to chainsaw your way through. A local logger, Allman would later tell reporters, summed up his predicament best: “‘So, Tom, what you’re saying is, in 400 square miles, you’re not trying to find a rabbit. You’re trying to find the rabbit — and the rabbit has an assault rifle.’”
As deputies searched, detectives interviewed Aaron’s parents. Jim had cleared away brush near his house so Aaron would have no place to lurk, and he’d been sleeping with a pistol nearby. He didn’t think his son would shoot him — but he didn’t want to confront him unarmed, either. In other moments, though, he softened into a worried dad: What if Aaron kills himself in the forest, he wondered, and no one finds his body?
Laura was equally distraught. Until now, she told detectives, Aaron had either stopped by her house or called every week. The last time she saw him, they went grocery shop­ping, and he bought 15 packs of ramen, some Best Yet rice, white-grape juice, bananas, Skittles, Milky Ways, Star­bursts, Butterfingers, Milk Duds, and Hershey’s Kisses. (He’d always had a sweet tooth.) Then she drove him about 45 minutes up Highway 1 to a redwood grove that parted to a stunning expanse of sea; Aaron hopped out with his groceries and his rifle, a recent loan from an uncle.

Jim had cleared away brush near his house so Aaron would have no place to lurk, and he’d been sleeping with a pistol nearby.
When Laura mentioned the grove, detectives were startled. It was a potential clue in another homicide. About two weeks earlier, Matthew Coleman, a 45-year-old land manager, had been murdered. He was an unlikely victim: an avid reader and “gentle giant,” according to his sister.
Coleman arrived one morning at a conservation group’s property where he was clearing trails. He placed a weed eater and a pickax near his white Saturn station wagon. Then he was shot twice. That night, colleagues found his driver’s side door ajar and the car radio humming. Coleman was face-down, his head on the door frame, his right leg frozen midcrawl. Someone appeared to have defecated on his body. A search team discovered Hershey’s Kisses wrappers and foil twisted into a marijuana pipe. The results of a test comparing DNA on the foil pipe to DNA from Aaron’s blood came back soon after: They were a match.

Sheriff Tom Allman
As the manhunt entered its second week, Fort Bragg prepared for the annual Paul Bunyan Days parade, an homage to its logging heritage and the culmination of a weekend of fish frying, tricycle racing, water fighting, and ugly-dog judging. The procession would honor Jere Melo, and his City Hall colleagues planned to display a blown-up photo of him in a lumberjack shirt.
The day before the parade, there was a break in the case. A sergeant spotted Aaron near his mother’s house, and though Aaron quickly ghosted into the woods, deputies retrieved a backpack and a fanny pack belonging to him. It felt like rummaging through junk drawers. There was a bar of soap, a blue disposable razor, three aspirin. A bag of coffee grounds, several packs of fish hooks, a stained red rag. Two bags of seeds and dozens of rounds of ammunition, same caliber as the ones that killed Melo.
And then, wrapped in an ocean-tide chart and jammed into a plastic bag with a Raiders patch: 18 playing cards, each one an eight of spades.


Eighteen playing cards, each one an eight of spades, were found in Aaron’s backpack.
That last discovery especially troubled Sheriff Allman. The case had been consuming him. He kept dreaming about it, jolting awake, reaching for his phone to see if there was any news. That night, he couldn’t fall asleep. He sat in his sweats, Googling: “eight of spades,” “8 of spades,” “8 symbolism,” looking for meaning.
In most crimes, a motive quickly emerges: money, dope, pride, love. Once you grasp that, you start to understand the man, think like him, guess his next move. Only Aaron didn’t make sense. His own father compared him to an animal, cowering in familiar turf. There’s no explanation, Jim said. The sheriff had known someone a little like that: his brother.
A water-treatment operator who lived one county to the north, Mike never lashed out like Aaron. But his lifelong storminess mystified his siblings, and when they tried to broach the subject, he waved them off. Even after Mike shot and killed himself — news the sheriff learned while guarding hospitals in New Orleans after Hurricane Katrina — his family would never know why he unraveled. His obituary lamented only that his “big heart and compassionate nature was, in the end, unable to overcome his battle with alcohol.” Years had passed, and yet nearly every time Allman talked to their elderly mother, she found a way to bring it up.
When the sheriff realized how unsettled Aaron was, it reframed how he saw him: as a prisoner of his delusions. Allman was hunting someone whose trust he couldn’t win, whose motives weren’t grounded in reality. The meanings of the cards, the crosshairs, the crimes — they were all lost in the wilderness of Aaron’s mind.
IN THE WINTER of 2009, two years before the manhunt, Laura got a call. Aaron, then 32, had been arrested in San Francisco. Starting a few weeks earlier, Aaron had made several trips to the Chinese Consulate, a blocky white building that mostly blends into the surrounding Fillmore District. Sheathed in black, he left packages there. Diplomats panicked and called the police; a bomb squad found no explosives inside. Three times, the packages contained a drawing of a red star and a message: “Alpha RE, Martian Military and Chinese Weapons Designs.” The fourth time, when a cop saw Aaron heave a package over the fence and arrested him, the package held a black jumpsuit with red stars. Later, Aaron told a friend that Martians had been helping China build technology to invade the United States.
Following the arrest, while Aaron was briefly locked up, his sister, Natalie, walked over to his latest res­i­dence: a small, gray outbuilding behind the farmhouse he’d burned down. Natalie was three years young­er than Aaron and as blond and charming as he was dark and brooding. They were never close, but Natalie still wanted answers about Aaron’s behavior and hoped they were inside.

Natalie, Aaron’s sister
Aaron had thrown up a 6-foot-tall fence and padlocked most everything, but a window was open, and she wriggled through. It was dim inside, with the windows shrouded by black sheets. The kitchen floor was black, too. Natalie didn’t see any dishes; Aaron refused to turn on the gas stove, convinced he smelled a leak, though the utility company had checked and found nothing awry. He’d gotten rid of nearly all his furniture, except a large drawing table.
Natalie didn’t look in what the family called the dungeon, the roughly 8-foot-by-12-foot basement her brother had constructed as a sleeping chamber. She didn’t need to. The living room was a whirl of paper, hinting at the thoughts that consumed him: giant world maps, sketches of aliens. Natalie thought of A Beautiful Mind. For so long, she’d dismissed her brother as a jerk, a weirdo, a creep. Aaron’s really sick, she realized, and she was almost relieved he was behind bars. Maybe there, she reasoned, he’d get help.
LIKE AARON, 40-year-old Californian Scott Thorpe had reached an age when his peers had chosen careers, married, started raising kids. Instead, Thorpe shrouded his windows and stockpiled guns to fend off an FBI assault imminent only in his mind. Alarmed by his slipping grasp on reality, his family asked his psychiatrist to commit him, to no avail. Then one day in 2001, Thorpe brought a gun to a me­ntal-health clinic in Nevada County, California, shot and killed two people, drove to a restaurant he believed had poisoned him, and gunned down a third.
In the aftermath, the family of one of his victims, a 19-year-old college student named Laura Wilcox who was filling in at the clinic over winter break, began lobbying for a bill that came to bear her name. Passed in 2002, Laura’s Law makes it easier to court-order those who are rapidly and publicly deteriorating to be treated at home, a program known as assisted outpatient treatment.

The living room was a whirl of paper, hinting at the thoughts that consumed him: giant world maps, sketches of aliens. Natalie thought of A Beautiful Mind.
Laura’s Law is designed as a compromise between giving those with mental illness responsibility for their own care and locking them in state psychiatric facilities, many of which were considered inhumane. California was at the forefront of a movement that made it harder to commit people with mental illnesses and shuttered facilities nationwide (including one in Mendocino County; it’s now the City of Ten Thousand Buddhas, a monastery and training center). This deinstitutionalization was an effort intertwined with the civil rights era, as new antipsychotic drugs afforded the seriously mentally ill a chance to reclaim their autonomy.
The fallout from this system is apparent from San Francisco’s Tenderloin to Los Angeles’s Skid Row and in nearly every correctional facility. If Aaron’s story had ended with him as a 32-year-old marooned in a cell, obsessing over an alien conspiracy, it wouldn’t have been exceptional. A few years ago, when a grand jury visited the Mendocino County lockup, close to a fifth of the inmates had psychiatric troubles, on par with estimates from around the country. A dozen were in bad enough shape that they should have been hospitalized — including an inmate arrested on a misdemeanor charge who’d spent months waiting for a psychiatric bed. And those in jail aren’t the worst off. Last year,The Washington Post analyzed close to 1,000 fatal shootings by police and found about a quarter of those killed were either mentally ill or in the throes of emotional crises — and in many cases, panicked families or neighbors had been the ones to seek the cops’ help. “We as parents really have nowhere to turn,” says Dan Hamburg, a Mendocino County supervisor whose son has schizophrenia and once led police on a high-speed chase.


Pigeon carcasses were found near Aaron’s suspected location.
To patient-rights advocates, solutions like Laura’s Law are a throwback to the asylum era. Laura’s Law gives power to a roommate, family member, therapist, or law-enforcement officer to start a process that could force people into intensive treatment overseen by a judge, sometimes before they’ve even broken any laws. We don’t force cancer patients to undergo chemotherapy or diabetics to inject insulin, and the perception that the mentally ill are responsible for more violence than others is, for the most part, untrue.
At least half of people with schizophrenia, however, can’t recognize they’re sick, and so most states have some kind of involuntary outpatient commitment law. Several of them, like California’s, are modeled after a 1999 New York measure called Kendra’s Law. When researchers evaluated Kendra’s Law a few years ago, they found participants were more likely to keep adequate medication on hand and less likely to end up hospitalized. Sparsely populated Nevada County, where Scott Thorpe’s rampage took place, was the first county to fully implement Laura’s Law, in 2008. Its program is small, with fewer than two dozen participants during the most recent yearlong reporting period. They spent 79.5 percent fewer days homeless, 77 percent fewer days hospitalized, and 100 percent fewer days jailed — numbers consistent with past years of the program.
But the state didn’t provide funding for Laura’s Law, as New York did for Kendra’s Law, and it has to be approved county by county, meaning 58 separate conversations few people want to have. At the time of Aaron’s descent, Mendocino and nearly every other county hadn’t opted in. Only after a string of mass shootings involving disturbed young men — after Tucson and Aurora and Newtown — did state lawmakers agree to counties using certain funds to implement the law. Ever since, much of the state has grappled with the question that dogged Aaron’s family: How far should we let someone crumble before we step in?
IN THE THIRD week of the search for Aaron, detectives found that someone had jimmied open a window at a former Boy Scouts facility, Camp Noyo. On the other side of the building, they found a cross made of sticks. There was a motion-activated camera nearby, and they downloaded a stream of black-and-white photos. The sheriff had been toying with the theory that Aaron was less of a mountain lion, stalking prey through the forest, and more of a bear, lashing out only when threatened. In fact, Aaron had run into at least one transient, and he hadn’t turned on the man — he’d shared a joint with him. Maybe if they approached him the right way, he’d surrender?
But the photos hinted at a darker outcome. The man in them had a spectral quality. He stood outside the Camp Noyo kitchen, a rickety wood structure, his back to the camera, his gaze fixed on a small window reflecting a knot of branches. He wore a dark jacket, though because of the camera’s night vision, it gleamed white. His pants had split in the rear, and he’d tucked the ankles into pulled-up socks, pseudo-military-style. In his right hand, Aaron clutched a rifle, as large as anything in the movies. The position of his index finger made Allman shudder: He rested it alongside the trigger, as cops and soldiers do.There’s a killer in the woods, the sheriff thought, and we’re not smart enough to find him.


Images of Aaron pulled from a motion-activated camera at Camp Noyo
The search was stretching past a month; it had included dozens of law-enforcement officers pulled from the U.S. Marshals Service and from agencies up and down California. They’d scoured the woods but couldn’t stay indefinitely, and the rainy season loomed: storms pelting the coast, fog shrouding the forest. What else could they do?
Deputies had scattered 40 motion-activated cameras through the woods and ended up with an album’s worth of wildlife photos. Community groups offered a $30,000 reward, and mostly kooks responded. (One psychic claimed Aaron was hiding “around tall trees near to a large body of water,” which basically describes the entire Northern California coast.) The sheriff considered tucking notes in the brush, urging Aaron to give up — there was really no other way to communicate with him. But U.S. Marshals behavioral experts were helping with the case and warned that Aaron’s mind was too jumbled: Instead, they suggested, try short messages describing specific locations as either SAFE orUNSAFE.
As desperate as the sheriff was to find Aaron, he also felt a tug of sympathy for his family. Not just because of his own brother’s suicide, but because, as sheriff, he’d sat across from numerous parents who had begged him to help rein in their mentally unstable child, and he had been able to offer little beyond his condolences. He’d enlisted Aaron’s dad in the search. Sleep-starved and frazzled, Jim had considered trying to track down Aaron himself, an idea his wife nixed. He kept chewing over how the manhunt might end — with Aaron dead, probably. Just don’t let him kill anyone else first.
Jim boarded the Skunk Train one day with deputies. They handed him a bullhorn, and as the train lurched along, he pleaded with Aaron. Jim tried for a casual tone, as if his son were late for dinner, but he struggled to stay composed. Laura couldn’t bring herself to go. Instead, she shouted into the trees near her home — “Aaron!” — or left him a bag of food with a note:
“Aaron, If you come across this bag it’s from me, your mom. The bag is not bugged or anything. Please turn yourself in we are all worried sick about you. Please leave me a note. Love, Your Mom & Family
P.S. No one knows I left this.”
AS FAR AS his family knows, Aaron was never diagnosed with a psychiatric disorder — though medical privacy laws mean they only know what he chose to share. After the Chinese Consulate scare, he was enrolled in a federal pretrial diversion program. If he went to counseling, his charges would be dismissed. Sharing his dark thoughts seemed to help, though he told a friend he wasn’t like the other patients: They were nut jobs.
As the summer of 2010 became fall, and Aaron’s case wrapped up, he hurtled down­hill. He screamed obscenities at an off-duty cop waiting for his kid’s school bus. He parked on Highway 1 for days, eating Skittles while hunched inside his Toyota Tacoma, whose entire dashboard, including the speedometer, he’d spray-painted black. He was speed-talking and fidgeting, jabbering about survivalism, one-man warfare. His family was his only tether to society, and by then they were terrified of him.


There were crosses and crosshairs in the woods.
On a cool winter evening in 2011, Aaron barreled his truck into a chain-link fence outside the middle school tennis courts, barely missing a clutch of students. His blood-alcohol level was three times the legal limit, and when officers arrived, he thrashed and kicked so furiously that it took several of them — plus pepper spray and a taser — to pin him down and arrest him.
To those around him, Aaron’s DUI arrest was welcome. At least in jail, guards could subdue him if he careened out of control; on the outside, his family was powerless. Natalie was convinced that Aaron would kill himself, and she asked her dad repeatedly: What can we do?
Jim had been poring over a medical guide, the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, and he believed Aaron had schizophrenia. He consulted a woman named Sonya Nesch, whom he’d met through the local chapter of the National Alliance on Mental Illness. She’d written a book on mental-health advocacy and offered Jim a suggestion that, in her years of counseling families, had never failed to get some response: Send a letter to every official who could help, asking for a psychiatric evaluation and possible treatment. So Jim listed Aaron’s symptoms — paranoia, recklessness, rage — and implored for someone to intervene: “His family fears for his safety, there [sic] own safety and that of the community, if this psychiatric disorder is not addressed.”
Jim sent his letter to the county psychiatrist and to his son’s public defender. He was surprised when Aaron was sentenced to only a few weeks behind bars and ordered to attend a drunk-driving program.
In the spring, Jim opened his door and found Aaron on his porch. Father and son sat on blue furniture draped with blankets, the walls covered in horse art and family photos. Aaron chattered about his jail stint and his wrecked truck, and Jim listened intently. Then Aaron shared his plans: I’m going to go into the woods and get my head together. Jim thought, Great idea. In the woods, Aaron would be safe from society — and it from him.
DURING THE COURSE of the manhunt, police had been tracking someone who was breaking into cabins. The thief had bypassed electronics, marijuana, and anything else of value, and instead filched bread, peanut butter, jam, sausage, rice, pasta, hot dogs, a rack of ribs, dozens of soup and vegetable cans, two Coronas, and a bottle of cheap vodka. He swiped blankets, binoculars, a pair of firearms: a 12-gauge shotgun and a .22-caliber rifle. These were smash-and-grabs, and the thief left only whiffs of his presence.
Then, during one burglary, in the community of Northspur, the thief apparently lingered: muddying the kitchen, confetti-ing marijuana trimmings across a futon, swigging Jim Beam. The bottle was dusty, and a deputy noticed fingerprints on its neck. One turned out to be Aaron’s right thumb.

The sheriff had been toying with the theory that Aaron was less of a mountain lion, stalking prey through the forest, and more of a bear, lashing out only when threatened.
The morning after that discovery, a three-man team pulled up to a logging road and spotted Aaron, rifle in hand. Aaron opened fire, then disappeared. But the cops were closing in. The next day, just before dinnertime: a report of another break-in. Though the shop was on the outskirts of Fort Bragg — roughly a 14-mile hike from Northspur — the thief’s identity was clear. Among his plunder: a half-eaten bag of Lay’s barbecue chips, five boxes of ammunition, and brown hiking boots, size 12.
Deputy Caudillo arrived with a floppy-eared bloodhound named Willow, who usually worked the concrete sprawl of eastern Los Angeles County. She sniffed the shop’s rug. Padded over to a bench. Rocketed into the trees and led deputies straight toward Aaron’s bunker.
Every law-enforcement team was sent to the vicinity, and several hunkered down overnight near the dirt paths Aaron might use to escape. They melted into the hulking trunks, the gnarls of ferns, the darkness of a forest veiled in branches. It was October 1, 2011, a few months since Aaron decamped to the woods and 36 days since the manhunt began. Hours crawled by; sunlight eked through the trees; a new crop of officers rotated in. Finally, one deputy nudged the others, a prearranged signal.
A man was striding around the bend: stubbled head, broad shoulders, clad in black. He lugged a backpack with the stolen .22-caliber rifle, a couple hundred rounds of ammunition, and more eights of spades. He grasped the Norinco rifle, safety off, a round in the chamber. It wasn’t long before Allman, at the Fort Bragg substation, heard the radio crackle: “Target down.” Aaron was dead, struck by seven bullets.

Jim’s living room
THE LETTERS JIM SENT, it turned out, had disappeared into a bureaucratic void. The county psychiatrist apparently never saw them and never assessed Aaron.
For a long time after Aaron’s death, Natalie pilled herself to sleep. During the day, she busied herself with her family and tried to pretend her brother never existed. When he flickered into her head, she sobbed for his victims, their families. She still can’t keep pictures of him around.
Jim sat on the county mental-health advisory board for a spell and repeatedly pressed supervisors to adopt Laura’s Law. This year, Mendocino County became one of nine California counties to use it. It’s just a small test program, though, and Jim knows that a law can’t prevent every tragedy. When he speaks about Aaron now, his shoulders sag and his gaze drifts across the room, as if a ghost of sorts has entered.
The sheriff eventually self-published a book about the manhunt with a co-author. In it, he recounts the moments after hearing about Aaron’s death: hopping into a truck, speeding down Sherwood Road, passing Laura’s house. It’s the part of Fort Bragg where the forest envelops the town, and the roads soon peter into dirt. He stopped at a logging road cordoned off with crime-scene tape, and a deputy pointed up a hill. Seeing Aaron’s body, the sheriff felt relief, but no surge of victory. This was the same forest Aaron had played in as a child. He had been one of them, and now he was a crumple of black.
ASHLEY POWERS is a contributing writer for The California Sunday Magazine. She lives in Washington, D.C.
MCNAIR EVANS, a photographer based in San Francisco, is a 2016 Guggenheim Fellow. His current show, In Search of Great Men, is on view at the San Francisco Arts Commission City Hall Gallery through November 7, 2016.
HOLLY WALES is an illustrator based in the U.K. She has exhibited work internationally and has had her work featured in a number of books and magazines.
MUG SHOT: COURTESY OF THE MENDOCINO COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE; SURVEILLANCE IMAGES: BRIAN HEMPHILL